Nubodi started out using moonfruit to host their site, then later moved to a .Co. UK site. That site does not return pages except with the message in jag TV r's post. The moonfruit site is not returning all the previous pages in Google searches, and typing in the homepage address does not seem to work either. I think some folk are wondering if, given the dna experience, nubodi are also on the rack. For two sites to go awry seems strange.

Lucky – First of all, just to be clear, I know nothing about what is, or is not, happening with Nubodi.

So, can I just ask what site are you checking?

The website in this link is supposed to be the current Nubodi one:

http://www.necclassicmotorshow.com/node/6131

Tribute are very careful about using the words “1960s style” to describe the 250 kit.

Whereas, Richard uses the “F” word and calls it a “NUBODI AUTOMOTIVE 250 SWB koupe” kit in his advertising.
( Similar approach taken on the convertible. )

http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C725995

Perhaps people think it is his kit rather than Tribute’s?

If I was a betting man, I would guess any potential issue would be with the use of the name, not the shape.

But what do I know?

Cheers, Paul. :)

I don't know. I can remember all the fuss with the Lotus 7 lookalikes and Cobra's. Whilst there are still plenty of lookalikes on the market for both , you won't find any manufacturers using the words Lotus 7 or Cobra in any of their advertising. Maybe that's what it boils down to, being a bit close to the marque ??

Everyone knows what they are buying when they buy a lookalike, I hope that all its about. Trying to pass off a lookalike as they real thing would be a step too far.

How much!!!!!!!

79,950 in the advert.

Exactly

How much!!!!!!!! lol that's big bucks

Stunning car built to a very high standard.
I would love to see a Tribute 250swb finished to the same standard with the same interior, could it command such a high price?
I still think the 250 is a prettier looking car.

What was wrong with VPG 69? And "no" - the DNA is more rare than the original

Coupe, the convertible is much prettier IMHO.

Big difference on the big bucks DNA builds sre the interiors.

That add is a 'bit naughty' IMHO

Make: Ferrari
Model: 250
Model (alt): 250 GTO California Spider
A heart stopping brand new 250 GTO California Spider factory built in 2017

With just the price and one line to give a clue : Powered by a BMW 3.0 litre Z3

I can't see anywhere any mention that you are actually buying a second hand BMW Z3 with a plastic body dropped on. This is the sort of stuff the p155es of the F guys

Whilst the advert does not mention Ferrari in the main body, the badging is in the photos, and the standard form records Ferrari as the make. I wonder what the V5 shows? Not Ferrari surely. The advert is at least misleading, if not fraudulent. They only have to include the word replica and everything else comes into context. The website is equally culpable in my view.

I had to laugh "one of the most desirable cars", yet the seller has only had it a short time and will part -ex :roll:

Tbh you don't have to read far into the ad to realise it isn't actually a Ferrari, and the price should be a bit of a giveaway for anyone who actually knows anything about classic Ferraris.

Ebay do filter such ads out when they notice them/receive a complaint, but they don't seem to have an issue where something is accurately described as, for example, a Jaguar 'C' Type Replica or even Lancia D24 Spyder Evocation. :icon_wink:

Some people just don't seem to understand 'the rules' though - take this Karma, the seller explains that he's had to relist it as ebay took exception to the use of '911' in the title...

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Ferrari-D...wAAOSwsFpaGaKB

...and then relists it as a Ferrari Dino. Can't see ebay having an issue with that then!

some updates soon on this project, it's finished , just tweeting a few things before full release

Excellent. Thought the worst for a while it had gone so quiet - look forward to seeing the new creation.

Btw - are DNA aware of guy in Kent pumping out turnkey 2fiftys? In full trade dress so treading a fine line!

WOULD THIS BE IT ... ?

https://preview.ibb.co/mB2cCq/dena.jpg

Listed as Iconic Autobody creation ...a company started earlier this year by someone called Brian ....I'd make an educated guess thats the re-born DNA setup ...

That's certainly coming up as a 2.7 boxster! (uploaded by Dena)

Wow. Looks superbly done. Looks production. Wow (again).

Think they were saying turnkey only - tricky one. that was plan of Regal Classics with Boxster based Miura (quoted me 35k turnkey 3 years ago which i thought was cheap but never came to fruition and Regal have disappeared)

Its getting mixed reactions apparently ...people wrongly viewing it as a replica and getting their knickers twisted over proportions etc ....I view it as a homage , a modern rendition of a 356 , similar to the new Mini and new Beetle ETC ... And on that level , I think its very clever and a real credit to them ...

it's a retro take on the porsche speedster, an updated version just like what fiat did with the 500 ,mini,beetle etc
it was always going to be different size and propotions, it was never going to replica the speedsters direct, if you want that then get the chisel version
the other kit similar to this is the starke speedster in the USA, but look at there prices!!

Starke had a demo at the Las Vegas SEMA show, but in spite of them saying they had many orders, none have appeared.

+1 fella! The trouble with kit and turnkey/custom market is we are always going to offend someone. Iconic cars have their hard and fast following, but not everyone can either afford/build or construct them. Does this mean we should stifle our passions? Definately not. I love the original 356 car, but also think this is a very capable and polished interpretation from the photo. I know we do the same on here a bit by pushing what we believe is right or wrong, but sometimes people have to realise that different tastes or different strokes are what makes us unique and that shouldn’t stop people pursuing projects!
I absolutely love this forum for that “inclusive approach” and everyone’s engagement and encouragement whatever the vision of the builder.
(Caveat: 90% of the time!) :eusa_clap:

It is a lovely looking car and I can see where the conflicting opinions arise. However, given that it can never be a replica, I think the bonnet straps are a little silly rather than whimsical for example. It leads to the 'replica" line of comparison, when clearly, it cannot be. The car looks splendid without the tat.

I like it but not as nice as the original renderings, it looks a bit overdressed.
Lose the belts and the front spots. I would also like to see the wheel arches brought in a little too. Looks as if a boy racer has put wide wheels and arches on it.
Other than that I think it is very nice and would be tempted if it were available in kit form.

Less is more on these modern takes on old cars. The Fiat 500 , Mini etc take styling ques from the older cars they are inspired by but they don't try and replicate small details. To do so does make some people compare like for like which isn't the point.

It’s popped up all over Facebook Porsche pages it looks good to me (apart from whitewalls)

I don’t think people realise how big a Boxster is compared to a 356

I’d like to see a coupe /hardtop

can you link the Facebook pages, iam not on Facebook and would like to see the comments

it is a big car , compared to the beetle based ones

It's a great looking car - top work !!

I know I’ve posted these photos before, but I quite like the modern ‘old’ Mini & Fiat.

http://thumbsnap.com/s/guWcyi4q.jpg

http://www.fiatforum.com/gallery/dat...5193_1_1_1.JPG

Mister Towed has also posted these photos showing the size of the modern Porsche.

http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/...psf2a2db8f.jpg

http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/...ps8b480ec9.jpg

So clearly the modern version of the Speedster is never going to be an exact replica.

Therefore, the question should be is this an improvement on the donor Boxter?

https://preview.ibb.co/mB2cCq/dena.jpg

And I’d say yes. :cool:

Cheers, Paul. :)

PS
For those of us not in the know, what is/was the final story with DNA?

All the modern takes on older cars have one thing in common, they are a lot bigger.
As long as they market this one as a modern take and not a replica it should go down well. The proportions look right and it will appeal to those who like the retro style but with modern, real world practicalities.

I like it, but won’t ever be able to own one due to being US based.
I think it’s going to work well in solid colours like some of the prior CAD images.

I really like it. Needs to be smooth though. Such a classic design doesn’t need all that dressing.

And it’s better looking than a ‘which end is the front?’ Boxster in my view.

I wish the DNA guys all the best. They had s great product before and deserve success with this venture.

Dave

That shouldn't stop you, plenty of UK kits have made it over the USA.

I'd stay away until poof of several are made.
To expensive for an old Boxter.

?? there's about 7 being built now as we speak, that's without it being released yet officially

I picked up my boxster for £3200 with 55k on the clock with full history,
or you can get the 987 model for about £5k up depending on spec

I understand the logic, but to be fair, DNA have a great track record on quality.

Sorry, I was referring to the Starke Boxter based speedster (USA).

This one isn’t being made as a kit though.

I’ve imported a kit to the US before from the UK, it pretty painless with the help of the right shipper. Funnily it was the first DNA kit shipped over here. Great quality. Hence being a bit of a DNA fan boy.

I’m sure it will drive better than my JPS 356 coupe or my intermeccanica speedster. After around 50mph on the freeway, they got so light in the front, it was an ‘exciting’ ride - which you don’t always want.

I’ve watched the development and final output of the Starke version and the back end of it is just plain nasty. The one built by West Coast Customs wasn’t much better. Hats off to Brian and gang for getting this one to look so good.

front cover and article in this months kit car mag

Great article. Looks superb. But starting at 50k turnkey may be challenging with 2010 911 Carrera cabriolet available for less.

Fingers crossed for it