Hi M,
It’s always a problem with joining a conversation late in the day; so let me reiterate my very first post on this subject:-
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kitcarman
I reckon that everybody here can see what the issues were. That said, I think things have moved on. There are now new issues. It’s makes no difference to me whether the car drives well or not. My two concerns are whether it’s safe and whether it’s commercially secure.
The factory owner in Sri Lanka tells me that he’s in the process of evicting Vince  ….
The front upper wishbone ball-joint is being used for a purpose for which it wasn’t designed…. there is significant controversy concerning its suitability.
Incidentally, I was in court with Vince concerning his advertising debt the other day. He was ordered to pay me £803.82. |
I believe the public is being misled by dishonest publicity
.
Even if the chassis can be made straight and strong; the fact remains that the company making it is bent and weak. One aspect of it’s ‘bentness’ is in the fact that Vince
still hasn’t paid his Judgment debt (FFF May 05).
Another is in the reports in November's WKC
?
Den.