|
Mr T - Thanks mate.
While talking to AndyP57 it was clear how many changes his frame had to mine. ( Difference profile behind the dash & a "kink" in the frame for the steering column to pass. ) And there was only a gap of a few cars between our kits being made. So as you say, all the cars are different in their own way in certain areas. I am now allowed out to play after finally getting my daughter's new laptop up & running. I like this little guy you used in your post ... :rant: There was a lot of that going on as I tried to get all the products to download. Bloody new technology making me feel very old indeed. :rolleyes: Hopefully some photos of my own car later on, Paul. :) |
Quote:
Spot on T! I adore the fact that no two are alike in anyway. I love seeing how people have put their own spin on the building of their motors :icon_biggrin: |
Quote:
|
Much later than originally planned, but I did final get outside to work on the car.
Engine Re-Start - Take 3: I'd picked up some new fuel line at Stoneleigh, so cut & fitted a length the right size. http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8638.jpg But the engine still wouldn't start, although it make some promising noises this time. However, by the time the battery had given up the ghost it was still no joy. :icon_sad: Later on I noticed that a pipe had become disconnected from here... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8650.jpg Where the other end joins the carb. here... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8652.jpg Haven't had a chance to check what it does yet as I had to move on to... Back to the Future - Part 1 Yes it was time to bite the bullet & remove the frame to see if the Spitfire shell would work. I removed the petrol tank... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8644.jpg The rear framework... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8645.jpg The electrics put in to try and start the engine... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8647.jpg The front framework... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8653.jpg At this point I was left in the same rolling chassis position I had back in September. But I want to investigate the option of using some, or all of the Spitfire shell. So this has to be done and hopefully it will help my build in the long run. Although by this stage, my "workshop" was in total chaos... https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/WR...Y=w640-h480-no https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/C2...Y=w640-h480-no Before I moved the Spitfire shell, I needed to remove the old hand brake mech. http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8657.jpg Here is a view of the underside, not easy to see clearly with the shadow... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8659.jpg Then I had to rope my wife in to move the shell as I can't really lift it by myself. After a bit of huffing & puffing, the shell was finally in place... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8661.jpg Then it was back to manoeuvring everything else by myself. Thankfully I can get the Cordite body shell on & off single handed... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8662.jpg I knew the Spitfire wheel arches were still going to be in the way... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8663.jpg But before I could start getting the angle grinder out I needed a major tidy up. Because for a dreadful moment, it clouded over & looked like it might rain. So I moved all the framework & other stuff into a neat pile... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8664.jpg Which looked a lot neater with the tarpaulin over the top... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8665.jpg Due to the limit on photos per post I'll be back in a minute with more... |
Back to the Future - Part 2
With finally enough space to swing a cat, it was time to cut the wheel arches. ( And this was obviously repeated on both sides. ) Before: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8668.jpg After: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8669.jpg However, a bit of further trimming was required as the Cordite rear tapers in. http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8670.jpg At this point the "inside" of the Spitfire shell was now getting in the way... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8674.jpg So more cutting was required. Before: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8675.jpg After: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8676.jpg I didn't cut all the metal off in front of the arch in the hope it would clear, but it still fouls. So some more cutting is still required, but I decided to leave my neighbours in peace. I'll carry on cutting another day and see where that leaves me. ( If I end up using just the rear wheel arches & floor I still have all I need left in place. ) Just before I packed up, I had a quick check on my brake master cylinder. I've not completely given up hope on the dual line system, but it would need a "bulge". http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8678.jpg ( I have got a single line master cylinder as an alternative if required. ) The other thing I noticed as I was packing up was a crack developing in the bulk head. http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8679.jpg I had planned to soften the edges of these cuts with "curves", but hadn't got round to it. It can be repaired, but I need to take a bit more care when moving the shell about. Eventually everything was packed away and order was resorted to my drive once more... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8680.jpg Shame I didn't get the whole day, but I got quite a bit done in a few hours. :cool: So until next time, take care, Paul. :) |
Good to see you are making progress.
The small pipe is the vacuum advance and retard pipe. When there is a vacuum in the inlet manifold under throttle it operates the diaphragm in the distributor and advances the ignition. This will not stop the engine starting though. I understand how you feel with regards to running the engine, however as it has run whilst under your ownership so will run again. I wouldn't waste valuable build time to start it again until you fitting the loom, tank etc. for final fitting. It will run or be a simple fix. |
All the trial lifting on and off of panels and mm at a time trimming will come together in the end, Paul.
The pipe between the carb and dizzy is the vacuum advance hose. Hope I'm not teaching you to suck eggs (and I hope I've got it right!), but as the engine spins up the change in the intake manifold vacuum is used to advance the point at which the distributor fires the spark. This is because, with the crank rotating at high speed, if you ignite the intake charge with the piston at Top Dead Centre (tdc), by the time the flame front travels through the fuel/air mix the piston will already be on its way back down the bore, reducing the pressure that can be generated and losing power. By advancing the spark to a carefully chosen point where the piston is still travelling up the bore, maximum pressure can be generated at tdc for increased power and efficiency (modern cars use a computer to achieve this). Any engine experts out there please feel free to correct me, but with the vacuum advance pipe missing, I think your engine will fail to start because the distributor will default to full advance at idle, firing the spark far too early. The crack you've got in your bulkhead is due to the square corners rather than mis handling the shell. DC had the same problem with the edges of his cockpit as I recall. If I needed to cut slots in fibreglass or metal I'd use a hole saw to cut the radiused corners first, then join the holes with straight cuts. And finally, When trial fitting my body shell I lowered the suspension to where I wanted it and fitted the wheels I was going to use first. As the Triumph suspension travels up and down, because it's not a double jointed setup, the wheels scribe an arc as the camber changes. This results in the wheels sitting very differently in relation to the arches at different points on the suspension travel. Hence the silver Cordite demonstrator's wheels sticking out from under the arches. Lower the suspension and they'll tuck in. :) Unless you lower the suspension first, you're not going to know how the wheels are going to sit until it's too late. |
Quote:
|
FroggyMan, Mister Towed & DaveCymru - Thanks for your replies gents, I'll try to cover the points below…
Engine Re-start - I think I am going to just leave this for now & concentrate on the body work instead. As you say, it was driveable a while back & nothing fundamental has been changed since then. :pray: ( However, I will add double checking that the vacuum hose is still connected to my check list! ) Fibreglass Split: - My fault I know & I even posted a link that recommended avoiding square edges. :rolleyes: Driveway: - Unfortunately, my sloping drive makes working out what it straight / level quite hard to do. So I will try to prop up the chassis into a horizontal position before I finalise the fit & bond the body shell on. Cordite #007: I really do appreciate all the encouragement on here to just build my car in whatever way works for me. The reality is there are only a handful of these kits in existance & Ribble HQ have now abandoned this design. The new Navigator will have wholesale changes to both the internal framework & the fibre glass body shell too. If the kit supllier can't make it work as originally supplied, then I shouldn't be too hard on myself when I struggle. But I am very conscious that I need to make the most of whatever dry weather we get over the next few months. As there is still a lot of welding, rust treating, painting & fibreglassing to do to get any where near a re-body inspection. So I will remember SeaNick's post about knowing your limitations & I will look for the path of least resistance. Which leads me neatly to… Overall Stance - Without doubt, this is the area that is giving me the biggest head ache at the moment. As regardless of what I do at the rear of the car, or even with the bonnet, the bulkhead position can't go much lower. This only occurred to me after I had another look at this photo where I checked the brake master cylinder location… http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8678.jpg The "lip" in the body shell for the bonnet is around the right height relative to the horizontal bulk head "shelf". So if the body goes any lower, then even the standard size clutch master cylinder wouldn't fit under the bonnet. ( Note top of clutch m/c would be higher in this photo if the base was resting flat against the bulk head. ) But this set up leaves the bottom of the Cordite body shell sitting above the lowest part of the Spitfire bulk head. This will be the situation whether I use the whole Spitfire shell, or just the bulk head & Cordite rear frame. As using the Spitfire bulkhead removes so many other challenges I am reluctant to return to the original front frame. Therefore if I lower the rear of the Cordite body shell too much, it will effectively be pivoting around the Spitfire bulkhead. And I may end up with a body shell that appears to be "sticking up" in the middle & a bonnet that will not sit squarely at all. So if I can't get the body any lower, I may simply* "extend" the sides of the Cordite body work to cover the low points. * Obviously I am using the word "simply" in an ironic sense given how much work is required on even the "simple" jobs. :rolleyes: I will put some more thought into this at the weekend when I hope to spend some more time test fitting the body shell. The other good thing that came out of Stoneleigh was the fact these cars are already a bit different from the "norm". So what if I can't get mine to look as good as some of the completed Spyders on the road (or currently being painted :icon_wink:)? It will still have a large chuck of the original idea going for it and it will definitely stand out compared to most cars on the road. Cheers, Paul. :) |
Just before I add it to my "car stuff" pile, I want to quickly show one of the things I bought at Stoneleigh…
Bonnet Grille Options: The original plan for the Cordite was for it to have the same "Beer Crate" grille as the Spyders. http://www.madabout-kitcars.com/imag...dite-front.jpg But, as previously mentioned, I don't have one of these, I have the alternative Ribble "mesh" grille instead. Whilst there is nothing work with this grille, I think it will appear a little "lost" within the huge bonnet hole… http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8682.jpg http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8681.jpg I think the mesh wires would need to be significantly thicker for this to work (E.g. the style of modern Jags). I did have a look at Ebay for Jag grilles, but everything big enough to fit were going for big prices to match. I had also seen sections of perforated sheet steel in B&Q with various designs that might have worked too. But it was quite by chance that I spotted a stall at Stoneleigh selling grilles & other metal bits & pieces. This was almost half the price of the B&Q equivalent & with bigger holes too, so it became an impulse buy… http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8684.jpg http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8683.jpg I know this is probably not to everyone's taste and I think the final colour will make a big difference too. While I'll worry about the choice of colour another day, at the moment my options would include: - Leaving it bare metal, but use a clear coat, or similar treatment to prevent rust. - Paint it black which I think would really emphasis the size & shape of the bonnet opening. - Paint it blue to match the rest of the car, then the "holes" would appearing black from the engine bay. - Go for a contrasting colour like white or yellow I have no intention to start cutting out the shape for the bonnet until the hinge arrangement are finalised. But I should have more than enough grille left over for any Mr T style bonnet cut outs if they are needed. Cheers, Paul. :) |
Weather hasn't been too helpful today, so caught up a bit of other domestic stuff instead.
With a bit of luck I will get a chance to continue test fitting the body shell tomorrow. But I did get an unexpected delivery today (as I only ordered them on Thursday!)... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8685.jpg I will use one Jerry "can" (although they are clearly plastic) to empty the Spitfire petrol tank into. As while it is out of the framework, I might as well take the opportunity to paint it. I am also not sure how long the petrol has actually been in the tank? It has been there over a year since I got the car, and no idea how long before that. So when it comes to re-starting the engine again, I'll get some "fresh" petrol in the other can & use that. Cheers, Paul. :) |
Body Shell Test Fitting - Continued:
Based on the weather forecast I knew I'd only have a short while to do any work before the rain came. So I spent a while planning & getting everything ready, so I could get the angle grinder going shortly after midday. ( Well it was Sunday morning and I'd like to continue to be on speaking terms with my neighbours. :icon_wink: ) I knew that the Spitfire body shell was fouling the Cordite bodywork & needed more metal to be cut away. However, it quickly become clear that there was no way of keeping the original door opening section intact. Which means if I try to use the whole Spitfire shell, then I will need a more comprehensive supporting frame. However, if I end up just using the rear wheel arches & floors, then cutting this away make no difference. So I removed the Cordite body work (again) and gave the arches another trim. Driver Side - Before: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8690.jpg After: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8694.jpg Passenger Side - Before: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8689.jpg After: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8693.jpg This left the rear section of the shell looking like this: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8695.jpg Note: The pair of upright brackets on both wheel arches were given a trim after this photo was taken. I also shaved a thin strip from the bulk head to see if that would help. Before: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8691.jpg After: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8692.jpg After putting the Cordite body back on, my twin exhaust pipes were now fouling: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8697.jpg They are only pushed in place for now, so I simply removed them. If push comes to shove, I may need to have some "cuts outs" in the rear body for the pipes. The good news is that there is nothing to stop the rear section getting nice & low. This is the rear wheel arch now: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8699.jpg The bad news is that, as expected, the Spitfire bulkhead is too high by comparison. You can see that the Cordite body work is now pointing upwards from back to front. http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8700.jpg http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8701.jpg I've compared this last photo with the Ribble "Silver" Navigator photo (see previous post). On that car, the bottom line of the body work sits below the centre of the front wheel. Before I tried to work out what to do next, I just wanted to check the bonnet location. With the front brackets still in place, I needed to rest the bonnet on top of them... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8710.jpg Obviously this sent the front end skywards, but you can tell it would settle down roughly in place: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8708.jpg So thankfully, the position of the bulk head would still allow the bonnet to fit. More Thoughts: Now while the rain has been lashing down outside, I have been scratching my head a bit. "Why is the Spitfire bulk head so high compared to the rest of the body work?" After going back through old threads I think I have a better idea of what is going on. First of all, here is DaveCymru's Herald's bulkhead before it was cut down... http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f2...r/photo-12.jpg The reason the bulk head "chop" works for the Spyders is the gap above the master cylinders. There is plenty of excess metal available on the Herald, that is simply not there on the Spitfire... https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/r7...Y=w640-h480-no Note: This is still one of my favourite photos from the build. ( In those happy days before I'd actually tried to fit the kit! :icon_wink: ) When the original Cordite prototype was being developed there was no Spitfire body, just a rolling chassis. So a Herald bulkhead was used as the basis of the bulk head within the Cordite body shell. I've been looking at this "still in development" photo.... http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y18...DSCF0246-2.jpg The bottom horizontal line of the fibre glass bulkhead sits on the Spitfire chassis. If you then extended the line of the chassis it would be above the side "lip" for the bottom bonnet edge. This is a photo from one of my previous test fittings of the Cordite body & the Spitfire shell... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8507.jpg Here, the breeze block is where the Spitfire chassis would sit & a horizontal line can be extended from there. Now imagine lowering the Cordite body until that bottom bonnet lip was in the same place as the other photo. At this point the fibre glass horizontal bulk head "shelf" would be much lower than the Spitfire one. So the good news is that I am not going mad, there is a good reason I'm struggling to line everything up. The bad news is I am effectively trying to fit a square peg into a round hole! Not sure I know what I can do from here, but I will go away and think some more. Until next time, take care, Paul. :) |
Isn't there still the option of using the Cordite fibreglass bulkhead and front floorpans?
I know there's an issue with mounting the pedals/master cylinders, but wouldn't that be easier to address than trying to cut and shut the steel bulkhead? After all, wasn't the point of using parts of the Spitfire body to give you ready made rear arches? There'd also be the added bonus of eradicating the chance of rust in the front floors. Good luck :) |
Mr T - You are right, I did get the whole shell for less than the price I was being quoted for just rear aches.
So it is only lost time, rather than money, if they are the only bit I can realistically use. If I now commit to using the rear frame work, I can safely cut the shell in two. Although I'd still want to see what using the rear frame & Spitfire bulkhead would look like. Although, deep down, I do not expect this to work is the way I originally hoped it would. Then it will be back to the drawing board to make the original frame work fit/work. But, as always, I will take comfort from all the modifications you have done to your car. Cheers, Paul. :) |
You might want to keep an eye on this thread 'next door' -
http://www.madabout-kitcars.com/foru...ead.php?t=4290 It looks like Tribute might just be carrying out the modifications you need on your bulkhead to one of theirs some time soon. No offence to the Sammio/Ribble creators and/or current owners, but if anyone can get a sectioned Spitfire bulkhead to work I'm sure Tribute can :) |
Mr T - Don't worry, I love the work Chris & Dan are doing "next door". :cool:
What I now realise is the key to their success is building the kit around the donor. ( Which is hopefully where the new Navigator will end up. ) And finally... I had to go and tighten the straps on the car cover this evening as it was seriously windy outside. Looks like I've got a hard top conversion under there! :icon_wink: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8711.jpg Cheers, Paul. :) |
Saturday - Part 1:
I know it took me a long time to finally work out the difference between the Spitfire & Cordite bulk heads. :rolleyes: But the whole point of the exercise was to see if the new Ribble "fast build" approach was a realistic option for me. This is still a development idea at Ribble HQ & it would simply be too much work for me to follow this approach. :icon_sad: So I've reached the point of no return & can now safely cut the Spitfire shell into two sections with no regrets. This meant it was back to the old routine of removing the Cordite body shell & getting out the angle grinder. But before I cut the shell in two, I just wanted to check something first... In order to do that, I needed to remove what was left of the bodywork in front of both arches. Before: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8716.jpg After: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8717.jpg This allowed me to rest the rear frame work over the top... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8718.jpg If I can make it work, I will keep the hand brake section attached to the floor / rear wheel arch section. I think this would make for a more rigid structure than the separate hand brake panel that I already have. However, I would need to change the cross bracing on the frame to join where the masking tape is... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8719.jpg Hopefully this will allow the section you can see painted in black to sit over the frame work. This will involve "threading" the rear section of Spitfire through the framework. As the frame will be above the body at the back, but below the body at the front (if that makes sense). No doubt I will need to trim underneath the hand brake panel like I did before. in order for the frame to sit as low as possible I will need to remove some metal from the rear section. The originally mounting point is effectively double skinned... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8720.jpg So I knocked up a couple of cardboard templates that will show me where to cut... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8721.jpg Then it was the moment of truth, so I propped up both sides of the front bulk head... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8722.jpg As the last thing I wanted to do was cut through the chassis by mistake. :rolleyes: A couple of cutting discs later and I had a cut from one side to the other... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8723.jpg I needed my wife's help to remove the rear section & relocate it to my "bits" pile... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8724.jpg At this point I left the Spitfire bulk head in place as I still wanted to see if I could use it. It occurred to me that when the internal frame work was last in place the body sat higher. The only reason the rear of the Cordite body sits so low now is there is nothing supporting it. So if the frame is going to raise the rear end up a bit, the bulk head may not seem as high by comparison. There was only one way to find out and that was to but the rear Cordite frame work back in place. Which reminds me of another question I need to ask... As this is a temporary fitting, I didn't use the "rubber rings" that originally sat between the chassis & shell. http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF7490.jpg I asked AndyP57 about them at Stoneleigh & he said they hadn't used them on the Silver demonstrator. Can anyone else give me any pros and cons of using these under the Cordite frame work? With the frame in place, a slight trim was needed to what remained of the passenger side sill. Before: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8725.jpg After: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8726.jpg The good news is the rear frame and the front bulk head do sit together on the chassis. So the next step was to try and put the Cordite bodywork over the top. To avoid hitting the limit of photos per post, I'll be back with "Part 2" very shortly, Paul. :) |
Saturday - Part 2:
This is what my "Frankenstein" build option looked like before the body shell went on... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8727.jpg http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8728.jpg And just before I put the shell back on I removed the remaining two seat belt brackets. ( See my previous posts for the reason why they were not practical to use. ) Before: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8729.jpg After: http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8730.jpg Then I put the Cordite bodywork back on again to see how it looked. By this stage I knew it was going to be a long shot for it to work with no problems. I think the final verdict will be "close, but no cigar". :icon_sad: There is not much room left between the rear body work & the frame underneath... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8743.jpg But the bulk head is currently preventing the rest of the body from going any lower at the front. This is the gap between the door cut out in the frame & body work now... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8733.jpg And this is how tight it was when I had both parts of the internal frame work in place... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF7984.jpg The slope of my drive make the passenger side seem higher than it is. But this is what the body shell looked like... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8740.jpg The rear wheel arches are back to a much bigger gap... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8731.jpg Which is more like the stance of the AndyP57's Silver Navigator at Stoneleigh. Clearly the "slammed" look I had without the frame is not "normal"... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8713.jpg Which leads me nicely to... Rear Suspension - Lowering Block: My various "mock ups" have shown that the car will look a lot better with the lowering block fitted. Mister Towed also pointed out the other day that fitting it would also tuck the tyres in under the arches. :cool: So I will have another look at my Haynes manual to see what is involved and give that a go. Unfortunately most build threads seem to cover "before" & "after", but very little on "during". So any tips on what to expect / avoid / etc. would be most welcome. Bulk Head Requirements: And now the fun really begins as I need to work out the best bulk head arrangement for my kit. I am going to put a lot of thought into this as I need to get it right. I think I will end up with a hybrid of frame work and sections of Spitfire panels. Hump & Frame: Regardless of what happens with the front bulkhead, the hump is still fouling the frame... http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...L/DSCF8737.jpg As previously mentioned the door cut out mean the body can not be moved one way or the other. ( See photos above for the tight fit front & back. ) So this is another area to thing about as either the frame or the bodywork will need to be changed. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I had to stop work on the car at this point as the sky was getting dark & it felt like rain was coming. And as I now have two sets of car parts to cover, it is taking me even longer to pack up. Although typically for the weather at the moment, by time I've written this, the sun is trying to peek through. I need to do a few domestic chores before I can get out again today & I may have to wait until tomorrow. So until then, take care, Paul. :) PS You know how you often only know there is a hole in your shoe when you step in a puddle? Well I found the hole in my glove when I grabbed a slice of metal I had just finished grinding. As the hot metal was "branding" my finger it was clear where the hole was. :icon_evil: |
Assuming you've got Spitfire 1500 swing spring rear suspension, you're going to need a stack of three of these together with longer bolts or studs to lower the back end enough.
http://www.rimmerbros.co.uk/Item--i-GRID005384 As that'd tot up to about a hundred quid I'd be tempted to make my own. It will transform the look of the car though. :lock1: |
Paul, been looking at ride height myself when I was at Ribble on Friday. I currently have a 1" lowering block but I think I need to go at least another inch and possibly an inch and a half. The current lowering block is the rimmer part but am going to have some more made up by the machinist who is currently doing my gearbox to bell housing adapter and dry sump pan parts, it will probably not cost much more to have another couple made, he will also be doing me longer diff studs to accomadate the additionl blocks, once I have a firm price I will let you know.
Mac |
| All times are GMT +0. The time now is 22:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Madabout Kitcars 2022