View Single Post
  #14  
Old 31st December 2011, 17:07
simmos simmos is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 26
simmos is on a distinguished road
Default

It makes sense that Classic Replicas took their body moulds from a JH Classics AKA Deon car as the Classic Replica Dino shell they produce looks horrific with patch marks and gauges running all over the main body that would suggest plenty of botching from 3/4th generation moulds and needs hours of labour to give them an exceptable finish before paint, to be fair to Deon their bodyshells were of a good quality and they didn't skimp on the fibreglass....i think the reason for this was more to do with the outside company they used to make their moulds and produce the shells for them than anything that went on under JH classics roof.

I am pretty sure that Classic Replicas have produced their own moulds from a Deon and do their own fibre glassing hence the amateur finish.


Both Gordon Ainsbey AKA Classic Replicas AND John Hurst AKA John Hurst Classics/Deon are a pair of chronic bullsh!tters, and i challenge either of them to come on here and say otherwise.

Last edited by simmos; 31st December 2011 at 17:22..
Reply With Quote