Are you madabout kit cars      
 "We've Got Kit Cars Covered" Information about Madabout-Kitcars.com Contact Madabout-Kitcars.com         Home of UK kit cars - madabout-kitcars.com Various kit car write ups All the latest kit car news Kit car related and general discussion

Search
Manufacturers
Kit Cars
Kit Car Data sheets
Picture Gallery
SVA Knowledgebase
Clubs & Communities
Build cost estimator
Kit cars for sale
Knowledge Base 
KitcarUSA.com
Classic-Kitcars.com
 

Go Back   Madabout Kitcars Forum > Mad Build Area > Marlin 5exi builds

Marlin 5exi builds Calling all you sexi builders....sorry 5exi builders, show us your progress.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th June 2007, 11:39
Ex-Biker Ex-Biker is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 684
Ex-Biker is on a distinguished road
Default I have a SMALL engine issue.

It don't start!

Actually it hasn't started for some time, so when it came to turning it over yesterday, it didn't.

I am reliably informed it is seized and although probably repairable, it would be cheaper to get another one.

Now I have a little dilema. Do I get amother 1600 or do I get something else?

I am guessing the Honda route would cause too many issues with a part built car (designed for the 1600), but I can see an opportunity to look at an 1800VVC.
I know the gearbox is different and therefore the mounts, but this could possibly be overcome by making a new mount bracket to fit between the engine & mount.

I know I'll need the engine and all ancilleries including ECU, 5AS and alarm blipper. Is there anything else I need to consider?

I have a hydraulic clutch system fitted that I want to keep. Does this mean I will need to look at particular cars for the donor engine?

What do people think?
Stay with the 1600 or upgrade?
Upgrade to what?

What do I need to consider?
Reply With Quote
Available from eBay
  #2  
Old 13th June 2007, 12:39
bigrich's Avatar
bigrich bigrich is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 404
bigrich is on a distinguished road
Default

I'd be tempted along the 1600 Honda route......given the K series H/gasket reliability 1600 Honda would be interesting?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13th June 2007, 12:41
alackofspeed's Avatar
alackofspeed alackofspeed is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dorset
Posts: 1,180
alackofspeed is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm not familiar with the Rover lumps, but I thought the casings are the same for all the 'boxes used with the k-series, it's just the ratios that differ?

A honda K-series will cost you ££££ - physically fitting one in the car is easy, but the engine and parts to make it work, are excessively pricey:

Engine / box with OEM Ecu - probably around £1500 (best case - they vary a lot)
Driveshafts - £200 a side, if you get bespoke ones made, or slightly less if you cut and shut civic shafts on to rover shafts.
ECU modifcation - £700 (unless you go for marlin's £300 "box of tricks").
Fuel pressure regulator £50
Clutch kit £200
and many more odds and ends that I've forgotten....
..... have I put you off yet?

Higher output k-series has to be the way forward for simplicity / cost reasons?

Having said the above, and just to spice things up a bit: I almost put a VAG 20vt lump in my car, having played around with them quite a bit, and having good contacts for mapping / parts.... Engines have been going for buttons on ebay recently (a friend got one for £250 the other week), and for that sort of money you can't really go far wrong? If you get one with a k03s turbo, then the lag is negligible, and a very reliable 230bhp is easily obtained. They've been used to good effect in Elises!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13th June 2007, 13:06
Ex-Biker Ex-Biker is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 684
Ex-Biker is on a distinguished road
Default

The gearbox is different on the 1800 & 2lt cars. I have the info at home.

Engine wise, I believe the block is essentially the same for all 'K' series, the turbo being 'T' series.

As for the Honda option: Yes, you are putting me off. Not exactly the budget build I was after.

Audi power sounds great! I imagine cost could become an issue again though.

The turbo seems to sell cheaply. What would I need to consider to fit this?

(1.8vvc still looks fav)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13th June 2007, 18:19
limpabit's Avatar
limpabit limpabit is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Basildon, Essex
Posts: 1,800
limpabit is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi mate.

The 1.8 VVC uses the PG1 box. So essentially, to keep hydraulic, you can pinch bits from the 600 and 800 series. But as you say, you need to do all the wiring again. Not sure if it's a straight plug and play. Then driveshafts and mount.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13th June 2007, 19:29
SDMC001's Avatar
SDMC001 SDMC001 is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 351
SDMC001 is on a distinguished road
Default

Depending on how far you want to go yes another engine option would be worth considering, equally as others have pointed out if you steer away from the K series, you may be looking at some serious money. I have built the 1600K and it no slouch, and I have it on mind to beef up the engine later. So to that end my thoughts are the K series would be where I would stay.

Best of luck in whatever option you take.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th June 2007, 10:48
Ex-Biker Ex-Biker is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 684
Ex-Biker is on a distinguished road
Default

If I fit a different engine, will it effect the registration?

I don't want a 'Q'

Will the 1800 mate to the gearbox I have?

How easy would a 2lt Turbo fit?

If I do stick with another 1600, what ancilleries do I need & what can I keep?




Sooooo many questions
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14th June 2007, 18:22
limpabit's Avatar
limpabit limpabit is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Basildon, Essex
Posts: 1,800
limpabit is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi mate.

If I fit a different engine, will it effect the registration?
Hopefully not if you change the donor registration on the V5 log book with the new engine number. Will know better when mine comes to get registered.

Will the 1800 mate to the gearbox I have?
No as the 1.8 is a PG1 box. Yours i think is a R65

How easy would a 2lt Turbo fit?
Problem the same work as the 1.8 VVC K. Electrics (my electrics are easier than the K as no 5AS), driveshafts (a bit of a hybrid), engine mounts, exhaust and possibly 150 MPH clocks and V rated tyres. Would be harder to prove I would have thought proving engine age as the bubble did not come with a turbo lump. Unless you could prove it was a bubble turbo conversion.

If I had the space I would happly do it for you as mine is nearly finished.

Is your windscreen on and bonded on the dash?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15th June 2007, 07:15
limpabit's Avatar
limpabit limpabit is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Basildon, Essex
Posts: 1,800
limpabit is on a distinguished road
Default

Don't know if this of some interest.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ROVER-600-TURB...QQcmdZViewItem

Would have had it for myself as a spare. But can't justify to the other half.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15th June 2007, 09:06
Ex-Biker Ex-Biker is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 684
Ex-Biker is on a distinguished road
Default

+ another couple 100 for ancilleries . . . . . much more than I want to spend.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15th June 2007, 09:22
Ex-Biker Ex-Biker is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 684
Ex-Biker is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by limpabit View Post
If I fit a different engine, will it effect the registration?
Hopefully not if you change the donor registration on the V5 log book with the new engine number. Will know better when mine comes to get registered.
That's kinda what I thought. Shouldn't be too much of an issue to send the doc back for change of engine details.


Quote:
Originally Posted by limpabit View Post
Will the 1800 mate to the gearbox I have?
No as the 1.8 is a PG1 box. Yours i think is a R65
Does this mean they won't mate?
What are the major differences between the 'boxes?
If I get it from a scrappy, I'll probably end up with the 'box anyway. Will have to see how easy it is to keep the hydraulic clutch.


Quote:
Originally Posted by limpabit View Post
How easy would a 2lt Turbo fit?
Problem the same work as the 1.8 VVC K. Electrics (my electrics are easier than the K as no 5AS), driveshafts (a bit of a hybrid), engine mounts, exhaust and possibly 150 MPH clocks and V rated tyres. Would be harder to prove I would have thought proving engine age as the bubble did not come with a turbo lump. Unless you could prove it was a bubble turbo conversion.
Turbo looks like it will be cheaper, but changing the clocks could be an issue! (unless I can get 150mph clocks from a R400/45)


Quote:
Originally Posted by limpabit View Post
If I had the space I would happly do it for you as mine is nearly finished.
Ta - we are 300+ miles apart though.


Quote:
Originally Posted by limpabit View Post
Is your windscreen on and bonded on the dash?
No, trial fitted, but left until wiring checked (hence engine start).


I really like the idea of upgrading, but as I am really trying to build it on a low budget, I can see another 1.6 getting fitted.

All budget ideas welcome . . .
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15th June 2007, 14:26
Jon@JNRacing.co.uk's Avatar
Jon@JNRacing.co.uk Jon@JNRacing.co.uk is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
Posts: 243
Jon@JNRacing.co.uk is on a distinguished road
Default

Perfect replacement, no wires needed, and a good couple of horse power.

Two old nags, i've got plenty around my way like my next door nieghbours for example.

Just an idea
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15th June 2007, 19:02
alackofspeed's Avatar
alackofspeed alackofspeed is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dorset
Posts: 1,180
alackofspeed is on a distinguished road
Default

Well I take back what I said previously....

They're getting cheaper it seems, though perhaps the location had some part in it:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/HONDA-CIVIC-TY...QQcmdZViewItem
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16th June 2007, 22:29
Ex-Biker Ex-Biker is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 684
Ex-Biker is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon@JNRacing.co.uk View Post
Perfect replacement, no wires needed, and a good couple of horse power.

Two old nags, i've got plenty around my way like my next door nieghbours for example.

Just an idea
What's a perfect replacement?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 18th June 2007, 23:27
grant620 grant620 is offline
Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 65
grant620 is on a distinguished road
Default

1800 will mate to the R65 no probs.
Fancy a forged 1800 bottom end? I have a short block with forged pistons, balanced crank and rods kicking around...
Can mate your head to it - just have your head gas flowed...
Email me if you want on grant@gb-ent.com
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 19th June 2007, 06:55
limpabit's Avatar
limpabit limpabit is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Basildon, Essex
Posts: 1,800
limpabit is on a distinguished road
Default

Ah me bad. I thought all 1.8's was pg1.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 19th June 2007, 12:34
alackofspeed's Avatar
alackofspeed alackofspeed is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dorset
Posts: 1,180
alackofspeed is on a distinguished road
Default

In your defence, Grant didn't say all 1.8 k-series engines were fitted with a R65, just that they are compatible.

Assuming a 1.8 comes as standard with a PG1, presumably one would need to change the flywheel and clutch on a 1.8 vvc to mate it to a R65 'box?

Having said the above, the Which Kit build used a 1.8 vvc, and there's no mention of different engine mounts being needed, that I can remember.

What's the rule of thumb torque limitations of the gearboxes?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 19th June 2007, 13:04
Ex-Biker Ex-Biker is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 684
Ex-Biker is on a distinguished road
Default

1.8 & 2lt have PG1 gearbox where as 1.6 & below have R65.

Grant, your offer sounds interesting. I am doing a little research on it. I will probably be back to you.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 19th June 2007, 15:08
grant620 grant620 is offline
Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 65
grant620 is on a distinguished road
Default

Engine mounts on the body will be the same whether 1.6 or 1.8, but the mounts on the box itself would be different IF you switched to a PG1.
As per the otehr comment - you would also need to use your 1.6 flywheel and clutch if using the R65... Which does spring up another possible issue if you ran the 1.8VVC ECU (which I'm presuming you wouldn't?)

Anyhow - I'd recommend for ease:
1.8K
R65 box
1.6 clutch and flywheel
1.6 head (ported and flowed - even better with big valves!)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 19th June 2007, 18:00
limpabit's Avatar
limpabit limpabit is offline
Senior Member
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Basildon, Essex
Posts: 1,800
limpabit is on a distinguished road
Default

Did not realise that was all that was different from the PG1 and R65.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +0. The time now is 01:02.

copyright © madabout-kitcars.com 2000-2024
terms and conditions | privacy policy